[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQp-uoqw6zrgwGSrKx=B8h0zYNagj2=f0vmqO63+WwTPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:37:38 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: procps-3.2.8
Ok, I compare the patch from ALT to Owl patches...
thx,
daniel
2012/6/22 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:39:51PM +0200, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
>> In procps-3.2.5-suse-top-cpus.diff:
> ...
>> I understand that I leave as it is in the new code, right?
>
> Perhaps, but in general: please update us to what's in ALT Linux first,
> and then we may discuss what other changes we may want/need to make.
>
> As to one big -alt.diff patch (whatever is in ALT's package due to their
> git) vs. broken out patches (like what we have for 3.2.5 now), I don't
> have strong feelings one way or the other. One big patch may be easier
> in the long run if we're to continue sync'ing this with ALT. Broken out
> patches would make it easier what changed in our package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
