[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120622001030.GB27837@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:10:30 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: procps-3.2.8
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:39:51PM +0200, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
> In procps-3.2.5-suse-top-cpus.diff:
...
> I understand that I leave as it is in the new code, right?
Perhaps, but in general: please update us to what's in ALT Linux first,
and then we may discuss what other changes we may want/need to make.
As to one big -alt.diff patch (whatever is in ALT's package due to their
git) vs. broken out patches (like what we have for 3.2.5 now), I don't
have strong feelings one way or the other. One big patch may be easier
in the long run if we're to continue sync'ing this with ALT. Broken out
patches would make it easier what changed in our package.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
