[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110504065804.GA3557@albatros>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:58:04 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kernel 028stab089.1
Solar,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:24 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:03:45AM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 14:09 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > Can you please do both of these things at once?
> >
> > Sorry, I have no time to finish the update for Owl 3.0, it need a bit
> > more attention. I'll try to do it tomorrow.
>
> To avoid a possible misunderstanding: the kernel in 3.0-stable should be
> exactly the same as -current's.
I'm a bit confused with a word "exactly". Do I understand you correctly
- we need not only the kernel update, but also config files changes with
added/changed config options? And we don't need ping sockets in 3.0, do
we?
--
Vasiliy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
