[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110504012419.GA27455@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:24:19 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kernel 028stab089.1
Vasiliy,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:03:45AM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 14:09 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > Can you please do both of these things at once?
>
> Sorry, I have no time to finish the update for Owl 3.0, it need a bit
> more attention. I'll try to do it tomorrow.
To avoid a possible misunderstanding: the kernel in 3.0-stable should be
exactly the same as -current's. The only non-trivial thing to do on
this update is editing of CHANGES-3.0-stable (you need to merge several
change descriptions into one). For kernel.spec, there's no need to
merge the changelog entries - you may just copy the file from -current
as it is.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
