|
|
Message-ID: <aafcc993-868d-4bd7-90da-de0505c24bd8@protonmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:07:38 +0000 From: Art Manion <zmanion@...tonmail.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Questionable CVE's reported against dnsmasq On 2025-11-02 03:30, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > >> On 1 Nov 2025, at 04:00, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: >> >> CVEs against dnsmasq (CVE-2025-12198, CVE-2025-12199, CVE-2025-12200) >> and Kamailio (CVE-2025-12204, CVE-2025-12205, CVE-2025-12206, and >> CVE-2025-12207) mentioned in this thread are not yet disputed and have >> no comments of this sort in their descriptions. I asked VulDB to mark the dnsmasq CVE IDs as disputed. > As part of the Kamailio project I can say that we did just become aware > of these CVEs in your email. They do not make sense. Trying to get to > the report, the config files used to provoke the issue can’t be downloaded. > > If you have access to edit the config files, there are much more simple > ways to cause damage than to provoke a problem in the config file parser. > > We will have an internal discussion but that will likely lead to the > project disputing these CVEs. Hello Olle! I was going to do o the same for the Kamailio CVE IDs but defer to the project's decision. If you do decide to dispute, the first request should go to VulDB: https://www.cve.org/PartnerInformation/ListofPartners/partner/VulDB (I accidentally asked the MITRE CNA-LR first.) Regards, - Art
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.