![]() |
|
Message-ID: <20250513015957.GA29601@openwall.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 03:59:57 +0200 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: VMware PSIRT <vmware.psirt@...adcom.com> Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE-2025-22247 - Insecure file handling vulnerability in open-vm-tools Hi, Thank you very much VMware PSIRT for fixing and disclosing this issue. I'm sorry I'm not familiar with open-vm-tools, but I thought we could clarify the below for everyone in here: On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:57:46PM +0530, VMware PSIRT wrote: > A malicious actor with non-administrative privileges on a guest VM may > tamper the local files to trigger insecure file operations within that VM. > https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/tree/CVE-2025-22247.patch The commit message says: > Prevent usage of illegal characters in user names and file paths. > Also, disallow unexpected symlinks in file paths. Skimming the code changes, I see that the second part - "disallow unexpected symlinks in file paths" - is implemented by calling realpath() (or a Windows function on that platform) and seeing whether that changed the pathname or (almost) not. However, this will not disallow a symlink that appears after the realpath() call but before subsequent use of the pathname. Is a race condition like this relevant, or is it irrelevant given the way these tools are normally used? In other words, is the filesystem static when this code runs, or is it a live VM where "a malicious actor with non-administrative privileges" may operate concurrently with this code running? Can you please clarify? Thanks again, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.