Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAiePB65qp8UeYHGZsH3g+mbCe76jCS=MJ5EeM4f=F2x-FfyDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:12:29 -0600
From: Evan Carroll <me@...ncarroll.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Article: State of Sandboxing in Linux

A lot of words on that one,

Not sure if you're the author of the paper. But off the get go, I'm
extremely confused. I wanted to give my critique on the paper instead of
the technology. My experience with "user-space sandboxing" is kernel
user-namespaces. My interface to them is podman. It's not clear what this
"sandbox" offers that podman's rootless mode does not. I believe I'm in the
majority with experience in containerization. But you're grounding this
paper in "two prime examples of sandbox: Gentoo's sandbox and Exherbo's
sydbox" -- things most people have probably never used. This for me raises
the question: when would I want "Gentoo's sandbox and Exherbo's sydbox"
over kernel user-namespaces and podman?

I don't see that answer immediately and so my desire to continue reading
drops significantly. This is only constructive criticism, maybe I'm not
your desired audience but the title was interesting enough for me to jump
in.

--
Evan Carroll - me@...ncarroll.com
System Lord of the Internets
web: http://www.evancarroll.com
ph: 281.901.0011 <+1-281-901-0011>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.