[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8mtNuTegS129MQjHiLDqFM6XL+LPmUwzyPJgKkjTU7zdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:18:28 -0400
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: feedback requested regarding deprecation of TLS 1.0/1.1
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:44 AM Chad Sheridan <chadapsheridan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> As a sysadmin, I welcome all of the changes. As far as warnings/alerts, I
> can safely say, most of our clients don't read them anyway.
>
> > Can those machines be put behind a proxy?
>
> As for this, of course they can, but some clients will be tied up with so
> much red tape and budgetary BS that it's a solution that isn't feasible in
> a reasonable time frame.
++. Medical devices certified 10 or 15 years ago won't be able to
pivot as quickly as most people would like. And as I understand
things, the certifications for medical equipment can be lengthier and
more expensive than NIST's Cryptographic Module Validation Program.
(It's somewhat amazing how often Windows CE and Windows Mobile crop up
every now and again).
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
