[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240807210840.1eece9c3@zbook>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:08:40 +0200
From: Marco Moock <mm@...fdsl.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: feedback requested regarding deprecation of TLS
1.0/1.1
Am Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:48:14 -0400
schrieb Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:12:32PM +0200, Marco Moock wrote:
> > Am Tue, 6 Aug 2024 05:02:14 -0400
> > schrieb Neil Horman <nhorman@...nssl.org>:
> >
> > > 1) Are distributions/users comfortable with this approach in the
> > > time frame proposed?
> >
> > As a user, this is acceptable for me, but I know there are still
> > machines outside that only offer such old versions.
> > Some of them can't be upgraded easily because the vendor doesn't
> > provide any new versions.
>
> Can those machines be put behind a proxy?
Yes, but the proxy must support old and new versions and this will be
hard when support will be dropped. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
