|
Message-ID: <CAB=ivF-hcDEN3_tXk+4rUUwXpVAKYcmt+efkUpGgedPiA4CDyg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 18:09:06 -0800 From: Roxana Bradescu <roxabee@...omium.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, security@....com Subject: Re: hplip: security issues in `hpps` program due to fixed /tmp path usage in prnt/hpps/hppsfilter.c Thanks for making the community aware of this issue. Perhaps security@....com can help to route internally to get a CVE issued and find the appropriate owners to fix. On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:38 AM Matthias Gerstner <mgerstner@...e.de> wrote: > Hello list, > > this report is about the problematic use of fixed temporary paths in the > `hpps` program from the hplip [1] project. Hplip is a collection of > utilities for HP printer and scanner devices. > > There is currently no upstream fix available for this issue and this > publication happens after 90 days of attempted coordinated disclosure, > but upstream did not react to my report. > > This report is based on the latest upstream release 3.23.8 [2] of hplip. > > The Issue > ========= > > The program /usr/lib/cups/filter/hpps uses a number of insecure fixed > temporary files that can be found in prnt/hpps/hppsfilter.c: > > prnt/hpps/hppsfilter.c:1027: sprintf(booklet_filename, "/tmp/% > s.ps","booklet"); > prnt/hpps/hppsfilter.c:1028: sprintf(temp_filename, "/tmp/%s.ps > ","temp"); > prnt/hpps/hppsfilter.c:1029: sprintf(Nup_filename, "/tmp/%s.ps > ","NUP"); > > These paths are only used if "booklet printing" is enabled. For testing, > the > logic can be forced by invoking the program similar to this: > > $ export > PPD=/usr/share/cups/model/manufacturer-PPDs/hplip-plugin/hp-laserjet_1020.ppd.gz > $ /usr/lib/cups/filter/hpps some-job some-user some-title 10 > HPBookletFilter=10,fitplot,Duplex=DuplexTumble,number-up=1 > > The program will expect data to print on stdin this way. Just typing in > some random data and pressing Ctrl-d will make it continue. There is a > chance that it will crash, tough, since error returns from parsing > errors are largely not checked in this program. > > The three paths are created and opened using `fopen()`, so no special > open flags are in effect that would prevent following symlinks, also the > `O_EXCL` flag is missing to prevent opening existing files. The > resulting system calls look like this (for creation / opening for > reading): > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/temp.ps", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 3 > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/temp.ps", O_RDONLY) > > Furthermode there is a `chmod()` on the /tmp/temp.ps file: > > hppsfilter.c:110 chmod(temp_filename, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | > S_IROTH); > > The data to print (from stdin) is written to this file, and the file is > also made world readable explicitly via this `chmod()`. The issues with > these paths are multifold: > > - There is a local information leak, since the print job data will > become visible to everybody in the system. > - There is violated data integrity, since other users can pre-create these > files and manipulate e.g. the data to print. > - This may allow to create files in unexpected places, by placing symbolic > links, if the Linux kernel's symlink protection is not active. > - Similarly it may allow to grant world read privileges to arbitrary > files by following symlinks during the `chmod()`. > - It may allow further unspecified impact if crafted data is placed into > /tmp/temp.ps which is processed by the complex `PS_Booklet()` function. > > I did not research the impact of the issue further to see whether this > could lead to local code execution in the context of the user that is > invoking `hpps`. > > Suggested Patch > =============== > > To fix this issue all three fixed temporary paths need to be replaced by > unpredictably named temporary files that are safely created. Attached to > this email is a patch that I authored that accomplishes this. This patch > also drops the `chmod()`. The purpose of it is unclear, so it is > possible that this breaks something, if other processes with different > privileges need to access this file. > > There is no patch or any other information available from upstream. > > Affectedness > ============ > > Since, to my knowledge, there is no public version control system for > hplip, it is difficult to determine when this issue has been introduced. > By taking some samples from older SUSE distributions I found the issue > to be present at least since upstream release 3.19.12 from 2019-12-12. > > CVE Assignment > ============== > > Since HP is a CVE CNA, it is itself responsible for assigning a CVE. > Since there is no reaction from upstream I don't know if or when CVEs > will be available. > > Timeline > ======== > > 2023-08-21: I reported the finding privately to upstream via Launchpad [3], > offering coordinated disclosure. No other means of contact are > documented for hplip. > 2023-09-05: Since I did not get any feedback yet I urged upstream via > Launchpad to provide a response. > 2023-10-04: I shared the suggested patch with upstream, still no response. > 2023-11-17: The 90 days maximum embargo time we offer approached and we > published the finding. > > References > ========== > > [1]: https://sourceforge.net/projects/hplip > [2]: https://sourceforge.net/projects/hplip/files/hplip/3.23.8 > [3]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/2032375 > > -- > Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner@...e.de> > Security Engineer > https://www.suse.com/security > GPG Key ID: 0x14C405C971923553 > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg > Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.