|
Message-ID: <ZUkLvzta7YHSu/2l@openssl.org> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:52:31 +0000 From: Richard Levitte <levitte@...nssl.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: OpenSSL Security Advisory -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 OpenSSL Security Advisory [6th November 2023] ============================================= Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value (CVE-2023-5678) ========================================================================================== Severity: Low Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. The fix is also available in commit ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6 (for 3.1) and commit db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017 (for 3.0). It is available to premium support customers in commit 710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c (for 1.1.1) and in commit 34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055 (for 1.0.2). This issue was reported on 16th August 2023 by David Benjamin (Google). The fix was developed by Richard Levitte. General Advisory Notes ====================== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time. For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see: https://www.openssl.org/policies/general/security-policy.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEeVOsH7w9yLOykjk+1enkP3357owFAmVJCvoACgkQ1enkP335 7oytjRAAl2eNIEk0dNel7QoTFCTyXFl7IWUqWqNqx1WEr4oD/2SnFiOtQzOGl1U2 +Wr7y0GBz1cfY7xj5yw3JBajnq8v92rWHXfLheN4makflwhHwjx/faX/uTGey5Xp +5ZdKZTnkSMC4gY4gS3/SWlmyHZAYVjs/OJIlKXNYRl0q+91OBydQEcixvetIF+c tdog1im+92xvkOtm6RfYJXEg84keft4twzw+xxeiFQ8c856SvBOSEtIhewpF9gyo mP2QS8/Ne6zeLXuw52pbwc/nXSXR1qPSwv+PDcDMIaVtAKYthdMbsugW05pNori1 +bjbDQ9lM+No+jtbkWXObGKuXciWCnqGmKxgBIDCmpvTKSVJ2Bfnewy08a+nMkG4 ZNmvOpF53dqVAaJRMPPZURW5697cYteF1WDWen48rx+eEP96KGB0u/jPitF1yGWC larXfkpeoL8nK8c8BZS9wF1J8xUfH1TBzl78YdQInI6yNH1cIXCYquGPVYgJQU4O TIQwqYCghL2+c46AkooepW5E7ltWK7LHB/64BU7BiTZeMKH+DO8L1YvFgliZLpzo v9n3amunUylXzdcDznt01PtIwzTsEAKioxl0Xq7k9EQyNAdx3BL21MifkjxofUTV 54AyaYXtBVHNxqsZrdv6wVGc7F23vqmhmtS5IpgPkxtDQzKWdYk= =FBln -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.