[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTfewnLUAolOmzp0@openssl.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:12:02 +0000
From: OpenSSL <openssl@...nssl.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: OpenSSL Security Advisory
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
OpenSSL Security Advisory [24th October 2023]
=============================================
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing (CVE-2023-5363)
===========================================================
Severity: Moderate
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and
initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation
or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness,
which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or
EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after
the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length,
via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter,
within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially
causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers
and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in
loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D
section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in
GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will
produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory
exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security
critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation
and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that
application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since
decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly
vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being
vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then
this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this
issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because
the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.12.
OpenSSL 3.1 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.1.4.
This issue was reported on 21st September 2023 by Tony Battersby of
Cybernetics. The fix was developed by Dr Paul Dale. This problem was
independently reported on the 3rd of December 2022 as part of issue
#19822, but it was not recognised as a security vulnerability at that
time.
General Advisory Notes
======================
URL for this Security Advisory:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231024.txt
Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details
over time.
For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see:
https://www.openssl.org/policies/general/security-policy.html
OpenSSL 1.1.1 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Extended
support is available for premium support customers:
https://www.openssl.org/support/contracts.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=aGd3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
