[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG-20GTRbwEtcQkG035OEQrZ-afZ-t8wCRCa3ZDu+JKbhmQ2-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 02:53:07 +0800
From: Tianyu Chen <billchenchina2001@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 02:29 Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>
wrote:
> To be clear: if openEuler was granted membership, this would ensure that
> I did not post on distros@ ever again, unless a trusted entity (such as
> the Linux Foundation) made a public, broadly applicable, and easily
> interpretable (by non-lawyers) statement stating that it would be okay
> for me to make such a post. And maybe not even then.
>
So why do you believe posting to distros@ is completely lawful? You can't
promise all subscribers are outside of DPRK, China, Russia, Iran.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
