[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d98ab3d26a1aeffb7542ba96b4bb73a5761b052e.camel@orlitzky.com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 17:55:13 -0400
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@...itzky.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Perl's HTTP::Tiny has insecure TLS cert default,
affecting CPAN.pm and other modules
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 22:40 +0200, Moritz Bechler wrote:
>
> while one may criticize that CVEs have been assigned both for the
> insecure default and (some of the) insecure usages, at least one of
> these is a legitimate case, in terms of CVEs likely the latter. And when
> it comes to defaming projects, at least in my book, choosing, keeping
> and defending bad defaults speaks to much more than a CVE being assigned.
They're both bad defaults. One explicitly does no authentication, while
the other uses a corrupt and misunderstood process that can create a
false sense of security. We disagree on which is worse, but neither
viewpoint is ludicrous.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
