[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHKPuKFDBmPF2So+g=VTkgniFGJpXHZ37kv+urCM-_j4pkjNRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:51:04 +0100
From: Arnout Engelen <engelen@...che.org>
To: John Helmert III <ajak@...too.org>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, security@...che.org, jorton@...che.org,
carnil@...ian.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2022-22728: libapreq2: libapreq2 multipart
form parse memory corruption
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 6:42 PM John Helmert III <ajak@...too.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 10:54:00AM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:54 PM John Helmert III <ajak@...too.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:01:23AM -0500, John Helmert III wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:09:16PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > > > > A flaw in libapreq2 versions 2.16 and earlier could cause a buffer
> > > > > > overflow while processing multipart form uploads.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a fixed version or patch or upstream issue?
> >
> > libapreq2 2.17 was released on the same day as the advisory describing
> > the problem with 2.16 and earlier (https://httpd.apache.org/apreq/).
>
> Does it fix CVE-2022-22728? Whether or not it does isn't clear from
> the changelog [1], and I can't find a reference to the CVE elsewhere
> in the source tree.
I think https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1894937
contained the fix for this issue. This is included in 2.17.
Kind regards,
Arnout
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
