Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220407083543.GA16833@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:35:43 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: kangel <kangel@....edu.cn>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, pgn@....edu.cn, qiuhao@...ec.org,
	Pedro Sampaio <psampaio@...hat.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Linux kernel: x86/kvm: null-ptr-deref in kvm_dirty_ring_push

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:15:42AM +0800, kangel wrote:
>     We found a null-ptr-deref in the kvm module which can lead to DoS. This flaw is in kvm_dirty_ring_push in virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c. The linux kernel version is 5.17.0-rc8. We would appreciate a CVE ID if this is a security issue.

Further in the linux-distros thread, this got assigned CVE-2022-1263,
however is this really a security issue - in other words, is a security
boundary crossed in triggering the bug?  I think it is not, and if so
the CVE ID should probably be rejected.  From the PoC:

> 		res = syscall(__NR_openat, 0xffffffffffffff9cul, "/dev/kvm", 0ul, 0ul);

In fact, also in the linux-distros thread it was promptly agreed that
this doesn't need an embargo - perhaps precisely because of no security
relevance?  If so, that should have been said explicitly, so a CVE ID
wouldn't be assigned (it was by another person).

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.