[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210811153158.gt6uk4qqaqw7lzo2@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:31:58 -0500
From: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: STARTTLS vulnerabilities
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Of course it's a very obvious idea for further research to look if one
> finds similar vulnerabilities to the ones we found in other protocols.
> So I'd really like to encourage other people to look for this.
>
> FWIW there are a lot of protocols with a STARTTLS mechanism, here's the
> list of supported protocols by OpenSSL:
> smtp
> pop3
> imap
> ftp
> xmpp
> xmpp-server
> telnet
> irc
> mysql
> postgres
> lmtp
> nntp
> sieve
> ldap
Not mentioned in that list was ndb, but as far as I can tell, that
project has already documented the ramifications of opportunistic
encryption as being a security risk, and all known implementations
(both servers and clients) with TLS support have a mode of execution
that ensures the connection is dropped if a downgrade attack is
attempted:
https://github.com/NetworkBlockDevice/nbd/blob/master/doc/proto.md#security-considerations
https://lists.debian.org/nbd/2021/08/msg00031.html
But I welcome review from those with more experience from the security
side of things.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
