Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CE800BE0-7398-4ABA-9980-ABC97A6EB67D@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:56:45 +0100
From: John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: linux-distros membership application - Microsoft



> On 27 Jun 2019, at 18:48, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2019-06-27 09:57:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:05 AM Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>>>>> 3. Have a publicly verifiable track record, dating back at least 1
>>>>> year and continuing to present day, of fixing security issues
>>>>> (including some that had been handled on (linux-)distros, meaning that
>>>>> membership would have been relevant to you) and releasing the fixes
>>>>> within 10 days (and preferably much less than that) of the issues
>>>>> being made public (if it takes you ages to fix an issue, your users
>>>>> wouldn't substantially benefit from the additional time, often around
>>>>> 7 days and sometimes up to 14 days, that list membership could give
>>>>> you).
>>>> 
>>>> Microsoft has decades long history of addressing security issues via
>>>> MSRC (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc). While we are able to
>>>> quickly (<1-2 hours) create a build to address disclosed security
>>>> issues, we require extensive testing and validation before we make these
>>>> builds public. Being members of this mailing list would provide us the
>>>> additional time we need for extensive testing.
>>> 
>>> It'd be helpful if you could directly address this part: "including some
>>> that had been handled on (linux-)distros, meaning that membership would
>>> have been relevant to you".  Without such examples yet, we'd have to be
>>> guessing whether the membership would have been relevant to you or not.
>> 
>> I'm not aware of issues on the distros list, but Microsoft has been
>> very active in working with the broader community on Spectre/Meltdown
>> style mitigations.  I think the community would benefit overall from
>> their participation on distros.
> 
> I agree with Anthony on this point. They've been beneficial to the
> greater Linux community and I feel like their direct involvement on
> linux-distros would benefit other members.
> 
> Tyler


I know this is "me too" but I agree with both Anthony and Tyler.  I'd also endorse Sasha personally from my association with him in the past.

jch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.