|
Message-ID: <87d0l7tl9d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:23:42 +0200 From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com> To: andreas@...mhold.de Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Multiple BIND vulnerabilities disclosed (CVE-2018-5743, CVE-2019-6467, and CVE-2019-6468) >>>>> "andreas" == andreas <andreas@...mhold.de> writes: > On 12:13 25.04.19, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> It is a bit unfortunate that these security fixes now use >> isc_atomic_xadd() which are not available on all architectures: >> >> .libs/client.o: In function `mark_tcp_active': >> client.c:(.text+0xc7c): undefined reference to `isc_atomic_xadd' >> client.c:(.text+0xca0): undefined reference to `isc_atomic_xadd' >> .libs/client.o: In function `client_accept': >> client.c:(.text+0x2210): undefined reference to `isc_atomic_xadd' >> client.c:(.text+0x230c): undefined reference to `isc_atomic_xadd' >> .libs/client.o: In function `exit_check': >> client.c:(.text+0x2958): undefined reference to `isc_atomic_xadd' >> .libs/client.o:client.c:(.text+0x5cb4): more undefined references to `isc_atomic_xadd' follow >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > There is a commit [1] on ISCs GitLab that removes the atomic operations > in favor of refcounting and thus fixes the aarch64 (and other archs?) > build error. > I applied that commit for NixOS. Looks good so far [2]. Yes, that was pointed out to me privatelyl. I am using it as well in Buildroot: https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=fc8ace0938a0bcf2e9fa628a88853252eabc991d Interesting enough, this fix is on the 9.11 branch: https://github.com/isc-projects/bind9/commits/v9_11 But not part of the v9_11_6 tag: https://github.com/isc-projects/bind9/commits/v9_11_6 -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.