Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 16:44:21 +0000
From: security team <>
CC: security team <>
Subject: Xen Security Advisory 280 v3 (CVE-2018-19966) - Fix for XSA-240
 conflicts with shadow paging

Hash: SHA256

            Xen Security Advisory CVE-2018-19966 / XSA-280
                              version 3

              Fix for XSA-240 conflicts with shadow paging


CVE assigned.


The fix for XSA-240 introduced a new field into the control structure
associated with each page of RAM.  This field was added to a union,
another member of which is used when Xen uses shadow paging for the
guest.  During migration, or with the L1TF (XSA-273) mitigation for
PV guests in effect, the two uses conflict.


A malicious or buggy x86 PV guest may cause Xen to crash, resulting in
a DoS (Denial of Service) affecting the entire host.  Privilege
escalation as well as information leaks cannot be ruled out.


All Xen versions from at least 3.2 onwards are vulnerable.  Earlier
versions have not been checked.

Only x86 systems are affected.  ARM systems are not affected.

Only Xen versions with the XSA-240 fixes applied are vulnerable.

Only Xen versions which permit linear page table use by PV guests are

Only x86 PV guests can leverage this vulnerability.  x86 HVM guests
cannot leverage this vulnerability.


Not permitting linear page table use by PV guests avoids the
vulnerability.  This can be done both at build time, by turning off the
PV_LINEAR_PT configure option, or at runtime, by passing specifying
"pv-linear-pt=0" on the hypervisor command line.

On systems where the guest kernel is controlled by the host rather than
guest administrator, running only kernels which have themselves been
hardened against L1TF _and_ avoiding live migrating or snapshotting PV
guests will generally prevent this issue being triggered.  However
untrusted guest administrators can still trigger it unless further
steps are taken to prevent them from loading code into the kernel
(e.g. by disabling loadable modules etc) or from using other
mechanisms which allow them to run code at kernel privilege.

Running only HVM guests will avoid this vulnerability.


This issue was discovered by the security team of


Applying the appropriate pair of attached patches resolves this issue.

xsa280-?.patch                                xen-unstable
xsa280-1.patch + xsa280-4.11-2.patch          Xen 4.11.x
xsa280-1.patch + xsa280-4.10-2.patch          Xen 4.10.x
xsa280-4.9-1.patch + xsa280-4.10-2.patch      Xen 4.9.x, Xen 4.8.x
xsa280-4.9-1.patch + xsa280-4.7-2.patch       Xen 4.7.x

$ sha256sum xsa280*
ff0b376b9e2ec16f7c15b144d4d38375d6f6b4019aa9c17f6b80f9dfe40319ef  xsa280.meta
41b2b91dbabbf2048c790c5934ab696ef53932ff98d1069eb7c7ae52e61cd44b  xsa280-1.patch
d46e46a6e706e0d3416d40ed12227223f7e8f825dfc63ed203c1df115976e8a1  xsa280-2.patch
163eaf2e16d5cc314a81fa1254eb2809674001b2329c41556a078b7f94e72ced  xsa280-4.7-2.patch
22e9d29f316356341db40c743ca59f9bb9d783a58fb6429d5badf57a77b5f34a  xsa280-4.9-1.patch
ff0a839dbd9347ec88aaeb7ef1145d0cd9029a19c6a478088c63c0959ba0e740  xsa280-4.10-2.patch
87940f3b84d0adfd89e1b2bc1a872ae2948e1621e4994e7879b77e327b0136b5  xsa280-4.11-2.patch


Deployment of the patches and/or mitigations described above (or
others which are substantially similar) EXCEPT the linear page table
disabling one is permitted during the embargo, even on public-facing
systems with untrusted guest users and administrators.

However deployment of the linear page table disabling mitigation is NOT
PERMITTED (except where all the affected systems and VMs are
administered and used only by organisations which are members of the
Xen Project Security Issues Predisclosure List).  Specifically,
deployment on public cloud systems is NOT permitted.

This is because altering the set of features usable in a guest in
connection with a security issue would be a user-visible change which
could lead to the rediscovery of the vulnerability.

Also: Distribution of updated software is prohibited (except to other
members of the predisclosure list).

Predisclosure list members who wish to deploy significantly different
patches and/or mitigations, please contact the Xen Project Security

(Note: this during-embargo deployment notice is retained in
post-embargo publicly released Xen Project advisories, even though it
is then no longer applicable.  This is to enable the community to have
oversight of the Xen Project Security Team's decisionmaking.)

For more information about permissible uses of embargoed information,
consult the Xen Project community's agreed Security Policy:


Download attachment "xsa280.meta" of type "application/octet-stream" (2066 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-1.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (4436 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-2.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5597 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-4.7-2.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5496 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-4.9-1.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (4402 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-4.10-2.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5507 bytes)

Download attachment "xsa280-4.11-2.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5504 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.