[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181016225024.746f423d@computer>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:50:24 +0200
From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ghostscript: 1Policy operator gives access to
.forceput CVE-2018-18284
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:57:22 -0400
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@...rmont.com> wrote:
> Again, given that PostScript is an archival format for a lot of
> documents, wouldn't a version of ghostscript with all the ability to
> do anything dangerous removed from the interpreter at compile time be
> rational?
I think nobody here will disagree with you that this would be good to
have.
The question is: Who's gonna do it? Will you?
--
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: hanno@...eck.de
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
