Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:52:43 -0800
From: Ian Zimmerman <>
Subject: Re: CVE-2017-16845 Qemu: ps2: information leakage via post_load

On 2017-11-17 11:14, P J P wrote:

> Upstream patch:
> ---------------
>   ->

Hi, what can I do with these QEMU reports?  I can try to apply the
patch, but I have no idea if it will work, because I don't know which
branch or revision it is based on.

By my unscientific counting, there are only 2 other userspace projects
which earn CVEs as frequently as QEMU: openjpeg and graphicsmagick.  In
both these cases, starting with the message posted here and following
the references, I can quickly locate the actual VC commit (in git and
mercurial, respectively) and thus have a sound basis for deciding what
to do: patch, wait for an updated distro package, or fork the distro

Is there a reason why that cannot be done with QEMU?

Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.