[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171103181243.lwtf3a5f4zjr4pzi@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:12:43 -0700
From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@...y.loosely.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Security risk of server side text editing in general and
vim.tiny specifically
On 2017-11-03 11:07, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> Due to the recent discussion on vim swap file use, I expected also
> attraction of of evil-minded to the topic of text editing security and
> thus an increase in attack probability on server side text editing in
> general. Therefore I wanted to review our software qualification
> criteria for text editing on servers, where vim/vim.tiny is used and
> probably update the SOPs and guidelines.
How much of this (and the parallel thread of course) applies to nvi?
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
