Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SG2PR0401MB18348536139981B099234273888B0@SG2PR0401MB1834.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:49:25 +0000
From: ne xo <nexo123@...look.kr>
To: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Cve issue discussion

Most bugs in ASan do not cause crash in non-ASan environments.

You should check with the valgrind tool.
________________________________
º¸³½ »ç¶÷: Glenn Randers-Pehrson <glennrp@...il.com>
º¸³½ ³¯Â¥: 2017³â 8¿ù 8ÀÏ È­¿äÀÏ ¿ÀÀü 4:32:13
¹Þ´Â »ç¶÷: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Á¦¸ñ: Re: [oss-security] Cve issue discussion

It doesn't occur on my own Ubuntu platform without ASAN.  But anyone
running with
a malloc that initializes the memory (trusted systems, etc) would be affected

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jesse Hertz <jesse_hertz@...le.com> wrote:
> fwiw, double check and make sure the issue occurs in libpng without ASAN. Sometimes ASAN can cause "heisenbugs" which only happen if ASAN is used.
>
>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <glennrp@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK I'll request a CVE for this libpng issue.
>>
>> Glenn
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/08/17 13:47, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:
>>>> It's not causing a crash, just a delay.  You'll safely get either an OOM
>>>> message or an EOF message.and no memory leak.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's scant comfort when your browser is the one hit by the OOM killer
>>> and then again when you restart it.  And also while you're wondering
>>> what's going on because your laptop is basically completely
>>> non-responsive ...
>>>
>>> So yes, it's a remote DoS and definitely worth a CVE.  We have had other
>>> similar CVEs in the past with image handling libraries not being
>>> sufficiently paranoid.
>>>
>>> jch
>>>
>>>> Glenn
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> if it could crash the image reader I would consider it "remote denial of service"
>>>>> classed and CVE worthy.
>>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.