[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17034856.l0NmUXmGEd@wanheda>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:03:16 +0200
From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@...too.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: lame: multiple vulnerabilities
Hello all.
I discovered some crashes (which will follow one-by-one) in lame.
Lame was fuzzed in the past by someone else so I take the opportunity
during the CVE request to insert also some past bugs.
1) Invalid read - CVE-2015-9099
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775959
2) Null pointer dereference - CVE-2015-9100
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777160
3) Invalid read - CVE-2015-9100
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777161
However, mitre decided that the bug N°3, CVE-2015-9100, can share the
same CVE ID of https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/06/17/lame-heap-based-buffer-overflow-in-fill_buffer_resample-util-c/
At this point, I'd like to mention that mitre won't assign anymore CVE IDs
for issues related to the Undefined Behavior Sanitizer, unless there are
informations about the exploitability.
http://common-vulnerabilities-and-exposures-cve-board.1128451.n5.nabble.com/Current-standards-criteria-for-Undefined-Behavior-td730.html#a768
The CVE IDs assigned in the past for the undefined behavior issues remain
valid. I will share anyway my findings about the undefined behavior issues.
They include, for completeness, some bugs that regard the frontend. You
can ignore them.
--
Agostino Sarubbo
Gentoo Linux Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
