[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHzNyaDjaD5kp0Xe5CSUNGoPbiRg1r=wphfBL6n1=ow00CTV5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:15:44 +0100
From: Casper Thomsen <ct@...arhaus.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE-2016-7056 ECDSA P-256 timing attack key
recovery (OpenSSL, LibreSSL, BoringSSL)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Cesar Pereida Garcia
<cesar.pereidagarcia@....fi> wrote:
> Vendor: OpenSSL, LibreSSL, BoringSSL
Noticed on https://nacl.cr.yp.to/features.html:
> Support for standard primitives
> Whenever NaCl includes (...) a newly proposed signature system, etc., it also includes (...) [TO DO:] an older standard signature system (e.g., ECDSA using the NIST P-256 elliptic curve)
I couldn't find traces of ECDSA in NaCl and the "[TO DO]" suggest that
there are in fact none.
Anyone able to reject the "non-findings"?
Kindly,
--
Casper Thomsen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
