[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170106101153.GB9517@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:11:53 +0100
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Firejail local root exploit
Hi Mitre,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0500, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> > * Firejail has too broad attack surface that allows users
> > * to specify a lot of options, where one of them eventually
> > * broke by accessing user-files while running with euid 0.
>
> > const char *const ldso = "/etc/ld.so.preload";
> > ...
> > snprintf(path, sizeof(path) - 1, "%s/.firenail/.Xauthority", home);
> > ...
> > symlink(ldso, path)
>
> Use CVE-2017-5180.
Is this correct? It starts quite far into the 2017 namespace?
Or have other CNAs allocated the previous 5000 ?
Ciao, Marcus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
