[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161014110106.GG31594@dhcp-25-225.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:01:07 +0200
From: Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>
To: John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kernel: Stack corruption while reading /proc/keys
(CVE-2016-7042)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:57:15AM +0100, John Haxby wrote:
> On 14/10/16 07:18, P J P wrote:
> > +-- On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, John Haxby wrote --+
> > | On 13/10/16 13:46, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> > | > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373499 (reproducer, patch)
> > |
> > | This bug isn't accessible. Do you think you could post the reproducer
> > | or open the bug please?
> >
> > Please see this one:
> > -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373966
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> Sorry, that's not why I was asking. You provided links to two bugs: one
> has the patch and a reproducer, the other has the patch. Unfortunately
> the former is a link to a bug that no one outside Red Hat has access to.
> In the past when people have posted links to oss-security that do not
> have general access the access permissions have been relaxed or the
> relevant content posted on the list.
>
> That's what I was asking for: inaccessible links are not helpful on an
> open list.
The other link to internal bug was posted by mistake. I am sorry for
that. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373966 has all the
information we can share.
Thanks,
--
Petr Matousek / Red Hat Product Security
PGP: 0xC44977CA 8107 AF16 A416 F9AF 18F3 D874 3E78 6F42 C449 77CA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
