[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99de9e1d-0488-31f2-5045-9d1bd11be781@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:27:00 +0200
From: Adam Maris <amaris@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: GnuTLS: GNUTLS-SA-2016-1: File
overwrite by setuid programs
On 07/06/16 08:45, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> GnuTLS 3.4.13 was released addressing GNUTLS-SA-2016-1,
> http://gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2016-1 :
>
>> Setuid programs using GnuTLS 3.4.12 could potentially allow an
>> attacker to overwrite and corrupt arbitrary files in the filesystem.
>> This issue was introduced in GnuTLS 3.4.12 and fixed in GnuTLS 3.4.13.
>> Recommendation: Upgrade to GnuTLS 3.4.13, or later versions.
> The relevant upstream commits seem to be:
>
> https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/compare/fb2a6baef79f4aadfd95e657fe5a18da20a1410e...86076c9b17b9a32b348cafb8b724f57f7da64d58
>
> Can you assign a CVE for this issue?
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
We already assigned CVE-2016-4456 for using insecure getenv() on
GNUTLS_KEYLOGFILE when we got a report for this issue. Not sure why it's
not included in the advisory. I'm dealing with that now.
Regards,
--
Adam Mariš, Red Hat Product Security
1CCD 3446 0529 81E3 86AF 2D4C 4869 76E7 BEF0 6BC2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
