[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160505103405.GA25044@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:34:05 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: broken RSA keys
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 09:18:26PM -0400, Stanislav Datskovskiy wrote:
> older versions of GPG
> will regard the bottom 32 bits of a modulus as the 'fingerprint',
> rather than performing a hash.
Are you sure? Got an example?
I think the fingerprint was always a hash, with key id being last 32+
bits from it. I think it is compatible with PGP 2.x's from 1990s.
Did I possibly miss some very early versions of GPG where this was not
true, transitioning from PGP 2.x to later GPG (which I did) and thus not
noticing this aspect? (Just trying to see how your statement could
possibly be correct and consistent with my experience using PGP/GPG.)
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
