[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1604011151000.27413@wniryva>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:55:26 +0530 (IST)
From: P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
To: oss security list <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
cc: cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Partial SMAP bypass on 64-bit Linux kernels
+-- On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, cve-assign@...re.org wrote --+
| Specifically, is there anyone who believes
| 3d44d51bd339766f0178f0cf2e8d048b4a4872aa must not have a CVE ID?
...
|However, it seems to be a bug in how the kernel responds to a
|post-exploitation attack pattern.
True, IIUC it seems more of hardening patch than an issue.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
