|
Message-ID: <f4df42b35dd9a6c8c6851eba66b2b3f1.squirrel@webmail-etu.univ-nantes.fr> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:24:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hugues ANGUELKOV" <hugues.anguelkov@....univ-nantes.fr> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: cve-assign@...re.org Subject: CVE Request - Linux kernel (multiple versions) ext2/ext3 filesystem DoS Hello, The linux kernel is prone to a Denial of service when mounting specially crafted ext2/ext3 (possibly ext4) filesystems. This occurs in the function ext4_handle_error who call the panic function on precise circumstance. This was tested on severals linux kernel version: 3.10, 3.18, 3.19, on real hardware and Xen DomU PV & HVM (the crash report attached is from a Fedora 3.18 PV DomU), from different distribution release: Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora, Linux Mint, QubesOS. This a low security impact bug, because generally only root can mount image, however on Desktop (or possibly server?) system configured with automount the bug is easily triggable (think of android smartphone?Haven't test yet). The crafted image may be burn onto SD card or USB key to crash a large panel of linux box. [ 929.200197] EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_iget:4058: inode #2: comm mount: bad extended attribute block 8390656 [ 929.200226] Kernel panic - not syncing: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic forced after error [ 929.200226] [ 929.200230] CPU: 1 PID: 980 Comm: mount Tainted: G O 3.18.17-8.pvops.qubes.x86_64 #1 [ 929.200233] 0000000000000000 000000007533690c ffff88000ea07aa8 ffffffff81722191 [ 929.200237] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81a84108 ffff88000ea07b28 ffffffff8171a462 [ 929.200240] ffff880000000010 ffff88000ea07b38 ffff88000ea07ad8 000000007533690c [ 929.200244] Call Trace: [ 929.200249] [<ffffffff81722191>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58 [ 929.200253] [<ffffffff8171a462>] panic+0xd0/0x204 [ 929.200257] [<ffffffff812ae4d6>] ext4_handle_error.part.188+0x96/0xa0 [ 929.200260] [<ffffffff812ae838>] __ext4_error_inode+0xa8/0x180 [ 929.200264] [<ffffffff81292869>] ext4_iget+0x929/0xae0 [ 929.200267] [<ffffffff812b31fb>] ext4_fill_super+0x18db/0x2b60 [ 929.200270] [<ffffffff8120af20>] mount_bdev+0x1b0/0x1f0 [ 929.200273] [<ffffffff812b1920>] ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x3d0/0x3d0 [ 929.200276] [<ffffffff812a3425>] ext4_mount+0x15/0x20 [ 929.200278] [<ffffffff8120b879>] mount_fs+0x39/0x1b0 [ 929.200282] [<ffffffff811afd95>] ? __alloc_percpu+0x15/0x20 [ 929.200285] [<ffffffff8122754b>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6b/0x110 [ 929.200287] [<ffffffff8122a38c>] do_mount+0x22c/0xb60 [ 929.200290] [<ffffffff811aab96>] ? memdup_user+0x46/0x80 [ 929.200292] [<ffffffff8122b002>] SyS_mount+0xa2/0x110 [ 929.200295] [<ffffffff8172a609>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 [ 929.200301] Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffff9fffffff)c I cannot attach the PoC (2x2MB too large) nor sending it in plain text (they are filesystems), so I've uploaded it on this website of free file sharing ... (sorry for the inconvenient): poc.ext2 https://1fichier.com/?zbk2gohk8s poc.ext3 https://1fichier.com/?9r0c8agjfa Can you assign a CVE for this? Thank for reading and your time. Hugues ANGUELKOV.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.