[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mpro.o3kthj03q98290o77.taviso@cmpxchg8b.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 09:20:07 -0800
From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...xchg8b.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Concerns about CVE coverage shrinking - direct impact to researchers/companies
Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
> So I've now heard from several security researchers that they are unable
> to get CVEs for issues that need CVEs (e.g. widely used hardware/software
> with flaws that have real world impacts and need to be properly tracked.
> This has definitely resulted in issues being publicized with no CVE that
> then makes it much harder to track and deal with these issues.
>
> I'm also worryingly hearing about people that may have given up asking for
> CVEs and publicizing their work at all, but of course cannot easily
> confirm this as I don't have any access on insight into what
> cve-assign@...re.org is actually doing/who
> they are talking to.
>
That's also the case for me, I gave up trying to assign CVE's a long time
ago. It's not that Mitre are not adding value, I can see the benefit of a
carefully curated list. The problem is that they're a big bottleneck in what
is an already painful process. I started the process of becoming a CNA once
to try and alleviate some of the delays, but that process was even more
painful and I gave up after a few months (this was a long time ago).
I'd only start using CVE identifiers again if they're assigned instantly,
and the curation is non-blocking.
Tavis.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
