[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56827FF4.4020607@geeklan.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:43:32 +0000
From: Sevan Janiyan <venture37@...klan.co.uk>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Being vulnerable to POODLE
On 28/12/2015 17:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Yes, this is what my meant, the documented SSL_OP_ALL setting is not
> really safe. But this is a different vulnerability from POODLE.
Understood.
Should I request a CVE for the use of SSL_OP_ALL which enables
SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS or use an existing CVE? (CVE-2011-3389?)
Sevan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
