[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202175839.GA24979@eldamar.local>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:58:39 +0100
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: hanno@...eck.de, cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Heap Overflow in PCRE
Hi MITRE team,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:00:31AM -0500, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> > https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/29-Heap-Overflow-in-PCRE.html
>
> This is CVE-2015-8380.
>
> The other PCRE issues have the consecutive IDs from CVE-2015-8381 to
> CVE-2015-8395 inclusive. See the URLs such as:
>
> https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8381
I have a question about CVE-2015-8384, according to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287623 the fixing commit
in upstream VCS is r1558, but (cf.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287623#c6) CVE-2015-3210
was assigned for the issue fixed by the same revision r1558.
Should any of those two CVE be rejected?
Regards,
Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
