[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO=Ty3QYgGBCZHhMVuyUBtv2-Gh65va4-QXQVZb2TDwAQPMQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:51:17 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing https://github.com/RedHatProductSecurity/Certificates-Shipped/
No, more of a "we'd like to avoid a superfish" and then I realized we had
some legitimate certs/keys for sure (e.g. firefox/bind) and.... maybe other
stuff? who knows. As an industry we have very poor visibility/inventory of
what we ship/how we ship it/etc. Witness all the SSL/TLS config issues
where many vendors can't really answer in any sane time frame how badly
they are affected.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Reed Loden <reed@...dloden.com> wrote:
> Great idea, Kurt.
>
> Is this related to this recent CERT/CC advisory?
>
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/566724
> http://blog.sec-consult.com/2015/11/house-of-keys-industry-wide-https.html
>
> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/RedHatProductSecurity/Certificates-Shipped/
> >
> > The idea is to create a comprehensive list of shipped certs/keys/etc by
> > open source vendors/distributions/projects so that:
> >
> > 1) we have a list of secrets maintained by external parties that we rely
> > upon
> > 2) we can audit them and make sure we should be trusting them
> > 3) also spot changes more easily (since the existing corpus is available)
> >
>
--
--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
