[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1637491389.15428660.1447791367866.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:16:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: x86 ROP mitigation
>
> It's not going to be increasing the cost of exploit development if it
> only means a script ends up finding different gadgets instead. Maybe it
> leads to better tooling being developed if it's far enough along, but
> that's one person investing their time once, not every exploit taking
> more resources to develop. If it's incomplete, how is it a layer?
>
It's the first step of a very long road.
This attitude is quite pervasive across security people, and it's not a
very good one. Just because the first iteration of a technology isn't
perfect, or the ideas have room for improvement is no reason to go all
negative.
Sometimes great ideas start out like this. If it's a bad idea, it won't
stick around for long. There are few instances where doing nothing is
better than doing something.
--
JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
