[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO=Ty3ii2MXgtpxVx0w-Vqd+yVSppauA8Qt4xFa7+uKddybSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:09:16 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Prime example of a can of worms
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Joshua Rogers <oss@...ernot.info> wrote:
> On 22/10/15 15:27, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> > Ideally we'd like
> > to see people using different primes (e.g. hardware manufacturers not
> using
> > the same primes as everyone else) and where possible people needing more
> > security (e.g. a VPN hosting provider) should generate their own keys
> > securely.
> Could it be possible to generate a new prime in the background, and when
> it has been generated, on the next reboot use that one instead? And if
> there is not enough time for the new prime to be generated, it falls
> back to the old one?
>
> I agree that manufacturers should be using a different prime per, at
> least, batch of products.
>
>
My fear would be device makers getting it horribly wrong on the devices in
question. E.g.:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/21/german_govt_mulls_security_tests_of_sohopeless_routers/
Having a large pool of known good primes would be easier for them to use I
suspect. Sadly we can't let perfect be the enemy of the good, or in this
case the "not completely terrible".
>
> Thanks,
> --
> -- Joshua Rogers <https://internot.info/>
>
>
--
--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
