[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150814092207.GR24097@symphytum.spacehopper.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:22:07 +0100
From: Stuart Henderson <stu@...cehopper.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: mprpic@...hat.com, siddharth@...hat.com, cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Duplicate Wireshark CVEs?
On 2015/08/13 21:53, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> Our perspective is that multiple sources, including the upstream
> vendor, currently have an error in which wnpa-sec-2015-14 refers to
> bug number 10844, and that the intended bug number for
> wnpa-sec-2015-14 (after that error is corrected) is 10978. We will
> check with the upstream vendor and see whether they can confirm that
> bug number 10978 actually does refer to a non-identical security
> problem that was addressed months after 10844.
I don't know if it's intentional or not, but I've noticed in the past
that Wireshark bug numbers are not permanent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
