[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B934B9.7040803@bytealchemy.be>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:16:57 +0200
From: z80 <z80@...ealchemy.be>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Qualys Security Advisory - CVE-2015-3245
userhelper - CVE-2015-3246 libuser
Actually, the things is very simple:
- H4x0rz: Lose The Ego!
- H4x0rz: Lose The L33t Principles!
- H4x0rz: Use your Brain v1.0
What would Brain v1.0 have told you when thinking about releasing an
exploit at the same time than the patch...
On 24/07/2015 17:56, mancha wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:43:43PM +0200, Leif Nixon wrote:
>> Qualys Security Advisory <qsa@...lys.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hello, it is July 23, 2015, 17:00 UTC, the Coordinated Release Date
>>> for CVE-2015-3245 and CVE-2015-3246. Please find our advisory
>>> below, and our exploit attached.
>>
>> *Why* are you releasing a full exploit just minutes after the patch is
>> released?
>>
>> (Disclosure: I am employed by Red Hat, but this is my purely personal
>> question.)
>>
>> -- Leif Nixon
>
> There was absolutely nothing wrong with Qualys' timing. When the embargo
> ends, it ends.
>
> The real problem is the underlying model: "responsible disclosure". It's
> nothing more than a CYA strategy that doesn't maximize the ecosystem's
> welfare. The positive-sounding name fools some into thinking it a good
> thing.
>
> --mancha
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
