[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cig332lhei9qz8.fsf@u54ee75415b8454d5169f.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:58:19 -0700
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...n.com>
To: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
Assign a CVE Identifier <cve-assign@...re.org>,
Colm MacCarthaigh <colmmacc@...n.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: AWS s2n
Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> writes:
> On 07/14/2015 04:03 PM, Markus Vervier wrote:
>>
>> On 14.07.2015 17:48, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>>> Reminder: Client mode is disabled and won't be enabled until X509 validation is ready. But we
>> can still make improvements and fixes in the meantime.
>>> so I'm not sure this needs a CVE as the code is not yet enabled.
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> that is a valid point from you and not for me to decide.
>> Yet with default settings a binary is compiled (bin/s2nc) which will
>> work in client mode when environment variable S2N_ENABLE_CLIENT_MODE=1
>> is set (as documented). So it is possible several people were tempted to
>> use s2n in client mode already as the client mode code is actually
>> compiled into the lib and useable by default.
>> I guess it depends on your definition of "enabled".
>>
>> Markus
>
> Ah, I didn't know that, Mitre I'm leaving this one up to you (way to
> much of a gray area for me to even poke with a stick).
Adding Colm from s2n upstream in case he would like to comment here.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>
> --
> Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
> PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
> Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
