[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pp57v3as.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 12:25:31 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
Cc: oss security list <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>, cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request Linux kernel: ns: user namespaces panic
P J P <ppandit@...hat.com> writes:
> Hello Eric,
>
> +-- On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Eric W. Biederman wrote --+
> | There are no dependencies between
> | e0c9c0afd2fc958ffa34b697972721d81df8a56f and
> | cd4a40174b71acd021877341684d8bb1dc8ea4ae
>
> Sorry if I misunderstood; I was referring to
>
> || >> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> || >> So I believe cd4a40174b71acd021877341684d8bb1dc8ea4ae prevents a
> || >> difficult to trigger crash if you have
> || >> e0c9c0afd2fc958ffa34b697972721d81df8a56f applied.
> |
>
> And also that, commit 'e0c9c0afd2' improvises upon 'ce07d891a089'; So unless
> 'ce07d891a089' is present, 'e0c9c0afd2' would not apply cleanly.
>
> | Neither commit (cec9c... or cd4a4017...) missing is a problem unless
> | ce07d891a0891d3c0d0c2d73d577490486b809e1 is present.
> |
> | Commits (cec9c... and cd4a4017...) are harmless on their own.
> |
> | I hope that clarifies things.
>
> Did you mean commit 'e0c9c0afd2'? (couldn't find commit 'cec9c...')
Yes. I was referrig to one of the two commits you called out. Typos are
wonderful.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
