[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150521141653.0EB24B2E24E@smtpvbsrv1.mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 10:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: alessandro@...dini.me
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: zeromq downgrade attack
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1273
> https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-x/commit/b6e3e0f601e2c1ec1f3aac880ed6a3fe63043e51
> https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3255
Use CVE-2014-9721.
> // Is the peer using ZMTP/1.0 with no revision number?
> if (greeting_recv [0] != 0xff || !(greeting_recv [9] & 0x01)) {
> if (session->zap_enabled ()) {
> // Reject ZMTP 1.0 connections if ZAP is enabled
> error ();
>
> if (greeting_recv [revision_pos] == ZMTP_1_0) {
> if (session->zap_enabled ()) {
> // Reject ZMTP 1.0 connections if ZAP is enabled
> error ();
>
> if (greeting_recv [revision_pos] == ZMTP_2_0) {
> if (session->zap_enabled ()) {
> // Reject ZMTP 1.0 connections if ZAP is enabled
> error ();
We think there is essentially only one vulnerability, and it was fixed
by that commit, but it is somewhat confusing because of an apparent
typo in a comment. Shouldn't the "== ZMTP_2_0" test have a "Reject
ZMTP 2.0" comment?
- --
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVXehxAAoJEKllVAevmvmsbfgH/2jRFmbbcvY3qV4yGoEhupxS
xiI4z5Emf7dgQ/J06/qK4EBCBbr4UfWD9MlEWPOJF1jC5x4ILz7R44nfLtNwvv+H
weBUUI7VcCIbzs4/aIhznHExz849e9ze2wQLURaZ+v9d7tuc9QpTGfDdOqI/Mu7h
9LKrZPKmbbx6HyQVZVCf3UETiNeSndbmF/Up8A8QPIkBDDUUNiigZTj3JRXCUyuP
3MtLHGECAg5+qst2CPaLgdp64CTRinHzNXffF6kOS71CaqPPj4O5sbUAaLQBEHsw
cyvTGsFyoM2NaefGnlG06Snk7EEfANwX9whCoQneHDNDK0Fr/L5sCwd+BYdQzlI=
=rSCR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
