[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519090559.56944c45@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:05:59 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, cve-assign@...re.org
Cc: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>
Subject: CVE reject request CVE-2015-8146/8147 (was:
[CVE-2014-8146/8147] - ICU heap and integer overflows / I-C-U-FAIL)
On Tue, 5 May 2015 09:19:20 +0100 Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> tl;dr heap and integer overflows in ICU, many packages affected,
> unknown if these can be exploited or not - everyone names vulns
> nowadays, so I name these I-C-U-FAIL.
...
> #1 Vulnerability: Heap overflow
> CVE-2014-8146
...
> #2 Vulnerability: Integer overflow
> CVE-2014-8147
Apparently a typo was made when fixing these issues in Ubuntu and
subsequently in Debian when ids with year 2015 were used instead of
2014. Incorrect ids are used in patch names and changelogs, but e.g.
USN-2605-1 was released with correct ids. I assume it's still prudent
to consider 2015 ids for rejection, it's likely they have not been
allocated yet.
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2605-1/
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/52.1-3ubuntu0.3
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/52.1-6ubuntu0.3
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/52.1-8ubuntu0.1
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784773
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Product Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
