oss-security - Re: CVE Request: zeromq downgrade attack

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150511051320.GA14900@lorien.valinor.li>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 07:13:20 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: zeromq-dev@...ts.zeromq.org,
	CVE Assignments MITRE <cve-assign@...re.org>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: zeromq downgrade attack

Hi,

On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> [ CCing upstream mailing list ]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> From https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1273 :
> 
> > It is easy to bypass the security mechanism in 4.1.0 and 4.0.5 by sending a
> > ZMTP v2 or earlier header. The library accepts such connections without
> > applying its security mechanism.
> > 
> > Solution: if security is defined on a socket, reject all V2 and earlier
> > connections, unconditionally.
> 
> A patch for the zeromq 4.0.x stable series is available at
> https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-x/commit/b6e3e0f601e2c1ec1f3aac880ed6a3fe63043e51
> 
> AFAICT no CVE has been assigned (or requested) for this, and the issue has
> been public since December of last year.
> 
> Could a CVE be assigned please?

For reference, an update for this issue has been released yesterday in
Debian as
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2015/msg00144.html

Regards,
Salvatore

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.