[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552D3F6F.1050502@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:25:19 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Problems in automatic crash analysis frameworks
On 04/14/2015 09:55 AM, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> This is mostly a question for the persons who assigned CVE-2015-1318
> and CVE-2015-1862. Should these CVE assignments be interpreted to
> mean:
>
> CVE-2015-1318 - in Apport, an unprivileged user can use a
> namespace-based attack because there is an execve by
> root after a chroot into a user-specified directory
>
> CVE-2015-1862 - in ABRT, an unprivileged user can use a
> namespace-based attack because there is an execve by
> root after a chroot into a user-specified directory
>
> with "Furthermore, Abrt suffers from numerous race conditions and
> symlink problems" not yet mapped to any CVE IDs? (CVE-2012-5660 is a
Because I asked Taviso to report them publicly, rather than play
whack-a-mole and do it slowly on distros, I'd rather do this out in the
open and all at once =).
> similar but older issue.) These additional ABRT issues would seem to
> be, for example, independently relevant on a system where the kernel
> was built without namespaces support. However, the raceabrt.c
> attachment says "This is a race condition exploit for CVE-2015-1862."
--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
