[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FA7687.2040401@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 20:54:47 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Another Python app (rhn-setup: rhnreg_ks) not
checking hostnames in certs properly CVE-2015-1777
On 06/03/15 06:08 AM, John Haxby wrote:
> On 06/03/15 01:02, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> Please contact your TAM/GSS with this request, it carries a lot
>> more impact if customers want something that we also want.
>
>
> I know "me too" isn't helpful, but I'm going to say "me too" anyway.
>
> It occurred to me that we could have a patch that has a global switch
> (eg a file in, say, /etc/sysconfig and a corresponding switch for
> individual applications) that switches on the correct behaviour. I
> know it's a bit of a mess, but that way people who don't care will
> continue in blissful ignorance and people that do care can do
> something about it.
That would be one way. But why can't Oracle build it and open source it?
Oracle has a Linux distribution too I thought? Or do you need Red Hat
engineering to do it first? If so as I said, customer cases carry far
more weight than oss-security for feature requests.
> jch
--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
