[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EDC1B2.9000602@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:36:02 +0000
From: John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fixing the glibc runtime linker
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 19/02/15 22:19, Tim Brown wrote:
> What's the fix?
>
> More often than not, the underlying issue is an empty element
> within the DT_RPATH header or equivalent. Sometimes it's not, but
> even in those cases, it is largely that one or more elements isn't
> qualifed (i.e. it doesn't start with /). The attached patch fixes
> this, by ignoring any elements of DT_RPATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH that
> do not start with a /, and/or junking any use of dlopen where the
> filename is likewise unqualified.
What about things like -Wl,-rpath=/tmp ?
That one is particularly egregious and, as Casper mentioned, there are
other ways of getting stupid RPATHs. I've seen a fair number of them :)
Would it be useful to check to see if and rpath directory is not
writable by the someone other than the uid/euid? Of course, it does
nothing for an RPATH that goes over NFS.
The Fedora packaging guidelines forbid the use of rpath completely
which is beginning to look more and more attractive.
jch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iF4EAREIAAYFAlTtwaYACgkQRQu7fpQvo8ihGAD/fppL/PSXpLep2TVz4Eh5G/ch
NxyTZXDIpXs0DAZTNuAA/RDQ7KBXT/43McHtHMHKFPlMWGnjEEkaAZ8MNQcle0Cs
=mnPH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
