[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <762269AD-1536-4CD5-87F9-90B425289707@thijsalkema.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:37:28 +0100
From: Thijs Alkemade <me@...jsalkema.de>
To: cve-assign@...re.org
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: jabberd remote information disclosure
On 23 feb. 2015, at 08:41, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> > When parsing a JID, jabberd2 version 2.3.2 and below truncate the data
> > but do not verify whether the result is valid UTF8 before passing it
> > to libidn. If the data ends with an unterminated multi-byte UTF8
> > sequence then libidn may copy data past the buffer into the result.
>
> > https://github.com/jabberd2/jabberd2/issues/85
>
> > the stringprep functions from libidn require the input to be valid UTF8
>
> > The libidn documentation claims "This function will not read or write
> > to characters outside that size." about the length of the buffer that
> > needs to be specified, but this is not true,
>
> We think this requires one CVE ID for jabberd2 and one CVE ID for
> libidn, because the issues could be addressed independently. For
> example, if only jabberd2 is changed, then libidn still has an
> out-of-bounds read issue with input from other programs. If only
> libidn were changed and (for example) the change was to fail on
> invalid UTF-8 data, then that would have a DoS effect on jabberd2.
>
> Did you believe that libidn does not have a vulnerability on
> its own?
>
I had not considered whether libidn has a vulnerability on its own, because
the libidn documentation is pretty clear that the input must already be UTF-8
encoded. However, as the security implications of not abiding by the API are
unexpectedly severe, I think assigning it a CVE makes sense.
Thanks,
Thijs Alkemade
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
