[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D2A541.7090904@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:03:29 +0100
From: Gsunde Orangen <gsunde.orangen@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request for some NTP stuff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kurt,
On 2015-02-04, 23:24 Kurt Seifried wrote:
> I haven't seen any CVE's for these yet:
>
> http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2671 vallen is not validated,
> leading to potential info leak
CVE-2014-9297 (according to
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#Recent_Vulnerabilities)
>
> http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2655 Multiple vulnerabilities
> in ntpd
This bug lists 8 different bugs, Bugs #1 - #7 are tracked in different
ids (#7 is the one above: id=2671)
The remaining bug #8 is defined as CVE-2014-9298 as in
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#Recent_Vulnerabilities
Note however, that the Cert VNDB
(http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/852879) uses the same CVEs for bugs #7
and #8, but mutually exchanged!
Either ntp.org or cert.org is wrong...
>
> Thanks.
>
You're welcome ;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU0qVBAAoJEF7aEoIg1YgH+8oH/2pXmwBExzjUtwUFGozKp2jw
EMSV63+fgqQhy/8NyypAc5sCPhUFMiY9rNhtq/XzyiSMP0LaD0CqEjOyRPZM1LCj
qWaRjrip8U6YDKAuUk3nMW7MHb/0DYWVTYIGFSaAYM3QJ2MuEiT0Jr+t3beFbzIe
IdpBm8gsb4ZfiWGggy0bmp3VLqDYvzuekpmG+UGtk8he027KGHyrE54wZ0XlNgUj
u85ugKyT0CO9/qrxBgFyckCQCQh3o2uPJdACm21x8lytdrsiXNNU3dW1oToH1IP0
kUo+8o2qjZgygRlZTkjATuevGTMX0V5/uz9awgQfG0Ggmhr9Ff2xGMNFjf4fRQo=
=XUnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
